Unfortunately, they were also defective, so he didn’t accept them. The consumer wanted a new sofa. The seller stated that it was not possible, because he had no longer such a furniture in the stock, therefore offered 5% discount. In these circumstances the consumer claimed that the only possible solution is termination of the contract. After that, the trader didn’t respond to phone calls and e-mails. The consumer turned for help to the ECC-Net. After the intervention of ECC Poland, the seller agreed to terminate the contract, picked up the defective couch form the consumer and returned his money.

Unfortunately, they were also defective, so he didn’t accept them. The consumer wanted a new sofa. The seller stated that it was not possible, because he had no longer such a furniture in the stock, therefore offered 5% discount. In these circumstances the consumer claimed that the only possible solution is termination of the contract. After that, the trader didn’t respond to phone calls and e-mails. The consumer turned for help to the ECC-Net. After the intervention of ECC Poland, the seller agreed to terminate the contract, picked up the defective couch form the consumer and returned his money.

Skip to content